For those who have been following this blog's series on youth violence, there may still be some lingering questions: Even if it has increased in other nations, hasn't youth violence actually decreased overall in America since 1970? Isn't the focus on violent teens simply media-hype that mischaracterizes young people, and "blames" them for world violence? In case these questions do not seem rhetorical to some, we'll consider them in today's final post on this topic. First: Hasn't youth violence in the U.S. actually decreased since 1970? No. Since 1960, the rate of arrests for violent crimes has steadily increased. There were significant spikes in the mid-70s and mid-to-late-90s, but even without these spikes the trend has been a steady upward climb. The 2006 figures continue to show an increase in comparison to the preceding five years. It's interesting to note that while violent crimes are increasing, overall arrests (including for non-violent and minor crimes) are not much different now in youth populations than they were in 1960. Does this indicate that now when crimes are committed they tend to have elements of violence more often than in the past? Or does it simply mean that law enforcement has less time on their hands to make arrests for minor infractions? In fact, both may be factors. Next: Isn't the focus on violent teens simply media-hype that mischaracterizes young people, and "blames" them for world violence? It seems highly doubtful that anyone believes teens are responsible for world violence. Rather, such news reports are usually intended as a wake-up call for parents to spend more time developing quality relationships with their children. As adults are made aware of the consequences of ignoring the potential of this important next generation, young people are honored, not denigrated. Today's youth grow up in a violent world. It is hardly surprising that they learn violence. Especially when parents abdicate the privilege to love and guide these amazing gifts that are their children. | 
